The Power of Music - Questions & Answers

Answer: "The Power of Music" is fundamentally a poem of exaggeration and absurdist satire that critiques a particular human failing: passionate, committed devotion to one's art or pursuit that completely ignores its effects on others. Sukumar Ray constructs the poem through escalating hyperbole, beginning with realistic details (Bhisma Lochan Sharma is a real person who sings loudly) and pushing them into increasingly absurd territory (his singing causes people to be trampled, animals to be confused, fish to flee, trees to collapse, birds to flip in midair, sky to weep, and mansions to tumble). This movement from plausible to impossible creates satirical effect. The exaggeration serves multiple purposes. First, it makes the critique funny rather than bitter—we cannot take literally a claim that singing causes birds to flip in the air, so we recognize we are in the realm of comic absurdism. Second, the exaggeration emphasizes the point: Bhisma's utter obliviousness to the suffering his singing causes becomes increasingly apparent as the destruction escalates. Third, the hyperbole allows Ray to comment on a real phenomenon—the way artists, ideologues, enthusiasts and passionate people often inflict their passion on others regardless of consent or appreciation. By pushing it to absurd extremes, Ray reveals the underlying problem: Bhisma doesn't listen, doesn't respond to pleas, doesn't seem to recognize suffering. He is "soared beyond our reach, howe'er we plead and grumble." This characterization captures a truth about passionate people: they often become deaf to opposition and complaint, lost in their own world of commitment. The poem's satirical message is complex and multi-layered. On one level, it critiques Bhisma personally—he sings terribly, and his terrible singing has absolutely no redeeming qualities. His passion for singing is not justified by talent or beauty; it is purely destructive. Yet on a deeper level, the poem critiques a kind of moral blindness: the inability or refusal to recognize that one's passionate pursuit affects others. Bhisma sings "as though he's staked his life," completely committed and absorbed. This commitment is not presented as evil but rather as a kind of passionate single-mindedness that drowns out awareness of others' suffering. The poem suggests that such commitment without self-awareness is dangerous and destructive. Furthermore, the poem satirizes collective helplessness. Everyone—people, animals, nature itself—suffers and complains, yet nothing changes. Words are powerless. Pleas are ignored. Complaints achieve nothing. The world descends into chaos while Bhisma serenely continues singing, indifferent or unaware. This satirizes situations where those causing harm cannot be reached through normal channels of complaint and petition—they have "soared beyond our reach." The final resolution reveals the poem's deepest critique: only force can stop Bhisma. The billy goat, rather than pleading, acts. He charges with horns lowered, "bellow answ'ring bellow." This suggests that when persuasion fails, when passionate obliviousness cannot be penetrated by words or demonstrations of suffering, forceful intervention becomes necessary. Yet even this is presented somewhat ambivalently—the goat's force is described as "brutal," and while it ends the chaos, the poem doesn't celebrate the victory as purely good. The final gift is not the goat's heroism but "silence"—relief from chaos, not joy at excellence. This suggests that sometimes the best outcome available is simply stopping harm, not creating beauty or joy. The poem's satirical message is ultimately that unchecked passion—commitment to one's art, one's ideology, one's project—that proceeds without considering its effects on others is not admirable but destructive. Such passion requires either voluntary self-awareness or external intervention to prevent harm. And finally, the poem satirizes our collective helplessness before such passionate obliviousness: words and pleas are useless; only force avails.

Answer: Sukumar Ray employs personification and metaphor strategically throughout "The Power of Music" to create both satirical effect and absurdist humor. Personification—granting human qualities to non-human entities—appears prominently in the descriptions of nature's reactions to the singing. Trees "collapse and shake," fishes "dive below the lake in frantic search for silence," and "the welkin weeps to hear his screech." These personifications of natural objects serve multiple functions. First, they expand the scope of the poem from a local problem (Bhisma's terrible singing) to a cosmic catastrophe. When the sky itself weeps, the problem is elevated to supernatural proportions. The personification of crying sky suggests that even heaven mourns this disaster, adding emotional weight and cosmic significance to what might otherwise be a simply annoying person. Second, the personifications create absurdist humor. We know the sky cannot literally weep and trees cannot literally collapse from sound. The impossible personifications signal that we are in a realm of comic exaggeration where realistic logic does not apply. This prevents the poem from being merely mean-spirited or bitter. We cannot take it literally, so we appreciate it as fantasy and absurdist commentary rather than cruel mockery. Third, personification allows Ray to express that the harm is universal. By showing not just people but animals, plants, and sky suffering, the personified natural elements suggest that Bhisma's singing violates some fundamental natural law. It is not merely that humans find it unpleasant; it is that the entire cosmos rejects and suffers from it. Metaphor functions similarly. The most important metaphor is "the golden gift of silence." Silence is metaphorically represented as precious, as a gift worthy of the word "golden." This reverses normal values—usually, music itself is precious and silence is merely the absence of music. Yet in this poem, silence becomes the treasure and gift. This metaphor encapsulates the poem's satirical reversal of values: in a normal world, a talented musician's gift is music. In Bhisma's world, the greatest possible gift he can grant is silence—the cessation of his music. The metaphor reveals that to those suffering from terrible music, silence is indeed more precious than gold. Other metaphors appear throughout: "the blast of brutal violence" metaphorically describes the billy goat's physical charge as a violent wind that scatters the song. The metaphor of violence suggests that only forceful disruption can overcome Bhisma's singing. Additionally, Bhisma's voice is repeatedly described through metaphor and imagery that dehumanizes or animalizes it: he "screams," the singing becomes a "screech," it creates "blare," it has violent force. These descriptions suggest his singing is less the beautiful expression of the human voice and more a primal, violent force like an animal's shriek or a natural disaster. The poem also metaphorically presents Bhisma's singing as an invincible force—he "soars beyond our reach," suggesting he has transcended normal human constraints. The metaphor of soaring elevates him even while critiquing him, suggesting he is beyond normal intervention or influence. This metaphor of unreachability explains why human pleas are useless—he exists on a different plane. The personifications and metaphors work together to create a consistent absurdist tone. By treating the situation with poetic language and elevating it through metaphor and personification, Ray creates emotional and cosmic significance while simultaneously maintaining comic distance through obvious exaggeration. We take the situation seriously (the cosmic implications matter) while recognizing it as ridiculous (sky cannot weep, birds cannot flip upside down). This tonal balance—sincere and comic simultaneously—is what makes the satire effective. It prevents the poem from becoming either purely cruel mockery or overly didactic moralizing. Instead, the literary devices create a space where we can both laugh at absurdity and reflect on its underlying truths about passion, obliviousness and the power of individual obsession.

Answer:

Answer: The poem's structural progression from escalating chaos to final intervention by an unexpected hero communicates important messages about individual responsibility, the limits of words, and the necessity of decisive action. The poem's structure follows a classic comedy trajectory: initial problem (Bhisma's terrible singing), escalating complications (reactions of people, then animals, then nature), apparent hopelessness (Bhisma unreachable despite desperate pleas), and sudden resolution (billy goat's intervention). However, this comedic structure carries serious philosophical weight. The early stanzas establish the problem localistically: Bhisma sings, people are affected. The poem gradually expands the scope of harm. First, humans suffer; they are trampled and become ill. This establishes Bhisma's singing as a local social problem affecting a human community. However, rather than stopping at the human level, the poem progressively expands the circle of suffering. Animals are confused and frightened. Fish flee. Trees collapse. Birds are inverted. Finally, "the welkin weeps"—even the sky itself suffers. This structural expansion from local (human) to regional (animal) to universal (cosmic/natural) suggests that the problem transcends any particular community and becomes a universal crisis. Nothing can contain or isolate the chaos. This structural choice communicates that some harms cannot be localized; they inevitably expand and affect all. The poem's structure also emphasizes the escalating helplessness of collective response. Early in the poem, the community attempts response: "The people, dazed, retire amazed." They try to escape or move away. This doesn't work—the sound is everywhere. They then attempt verbal persuasion: "And plead 'My friend, we're near our end, oh stop your singing quickly!'" This doesn't work either; Bhisma is unmoved. The community's attempted responses (avoidance and persuasion) both fail. This is structurally significant: the poem shows that conventional responses to the problem are ineffective. Words, pleas, complaint, and attempts to move away all achieve nothing. This communicates a message about individual responsibility's limitations: responsibility without willingness to listen and change cannot be invoked through standard social mechanisms. Bhisma's position of being "soared beyond our reach" is structurally central because it establishes that the normal functioning of social accountability has failed. At this structurally critical point—where conventional responses have all failed and the situation approaches hopelessness—the billy goat appears. Structurally, the billy goat represents an unexpected intrusion into the social problem. He is not human, not part of the affected community. Yet he is willing to act when humans could only complain. The billy goat's action is structurally presented as a necessary intervention precisely because individual responsibility (Bhisma's) and collective persuasion (community's) have both failed. The billy goat's charge with "blast of brutal violence" represents not a triumph but a tragic necessity. The structure communicates that when individuals refuse to acknowledge responsibility and when communities cannot persuade, force becomes the remaining option. Yet the poem doesn't celebrate this. The resolution is described as granting "the golden gift of silence"—relief, not joy. The structure thus communicates a pessimistic message about human accountability: individuals may refuse responsibility, communities may be powerless to persuade, and the only remedies available may be forceful and imperfect. Furthermore, the structure emphasizes the universality of suffering before the resolution. The escalation from people to animals to nature to sky creates the sense that absolutely everyone and everything suffers. The breadth of suffering established before the resolution underscores that some problems, once started, cannot be contained and affect all beings. This communicates that responsibility for one's effects is not optional—one's actions inevitably ripple outward affecting the entire cosmos. The poem's final structure—the bestowal of silence as "golden gift"—reverses values in a way that suggests profound disillusionment. Normally, music is considered a gift. Here, silence becomes the gift. This reversal, positioned at the poem's conclusion, suggests that when music (or any passionate pursuit) becomes destructive, relief from it—not its continuation—becomes society's most precious need. The final structure thus communicates that while passionate individual pursuits may be important, they are not more important than the well-being of the larger community. When they conflict irredeemably, the individual passion must be stopped. The overall structural progression from Bhisma's oblivious singing through escalating universal suffering through failed collective attempts at persuasion to forced intervention resulting in silence communicates that individual accountability, once refused, and community persuasion, once proven ineffective, leave only force as a remaining tool. This is a dark message about human society and individual responsibility.

Answer: